I just checked and we do not have spanning tree enabled on this switch or its partner. We have two switches with a 10-gig link between them. Each switch is connected to a different upstream router. The device in question is a session border controller for VoIP. It is a chassis with multiple four-port NICs that are in redundant pairs. Two four-port cards connect to one switch and the other two connect to the second switch. The cards use virtual IPs and MAC addresses. If a failover is required, an entire four-port card fails to the card connected to the other switch. At that point the NIC is supposed to send gratuitous ARPs to repopulate the MAC address table with the correct location. Based on the ethernet switching trace logs, it looks to us like the virtual MAC addresses on those NICs are regularly jumping around between interfaces, which is definitely not supposed to be happening. We're now stuck in a battle between Juniper and the SBC vendor over whose equipment is misbehaving. I wanted to make sure we were correctly interpreting those trace logs. I'm also still curious about why the MAC learning log is not updating. There hasn't been a new entry in the log in nearly two months, which just can't be true.
Thanks! John On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:05 PM, Harold 'Buz' Dale <[email protected]> wrote: > Are you running spanning tree ? > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jun 7, 2013, at 18:37, "Gavin Henry" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Is this a server connected via two ports? > > > > Sent from my iPad 2 > > > > On 7 Jun 2013, at 23:12, John Neiberger <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Also, another interesting thing about this is that the output of "show > >> ethernet mac-learning-log" stops at April 13th. I have no idea why. If a > >> MAC address were jumping around, we'd see it in the MAC learning > log...if > >> it were up to date. What would cause a Juniper switch to stop logging to > >> the MAC learning log? > >> > >> By the way, this is an EX4200 running 10.4R6.5. > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 4:07 PM, John Neiberger <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> We're trying to troubleshoot an odd issue and this log output makes it > >>> appear that a MAC address is flipping between interfaces. There are > other > >>> interfaces involved later in the logs. I'm starting to think this isn't > >>> telling us what we think it's telling us. Does this indicate that the > MAC > >>> address really is being learned from multiple interfaces? The confusing > >>> thing about the logs is the mention of l3nh. Is that layer three next > hop? > >>> If so, why are we seeing that in ethernet-level trace options and what > is > >>> the significance? > >>> > >>> I'm a little confused. Here is an example: > >>> > >>> Jun 4 13:07:22.953201 Attempt to add vlan sbc-core mac > 00:08:25:fa:3c:82, > >>> ifname ge-0/0/6.0, pnac_status 0, 0 > >>> Jun 4 13:07:22.953312 vlan sbc-core mac 00:08:25:fa:3c:82 (tag 40), > iif = > >>> ge-0/0/6.0: present in FDB > >>> Jun 4 13:07:22.953374 (3, 00:08:25:fa:3c:82) next-hop index change > [1344 > >>> -> 1328] > >>> Jun 4 13:07:22.953562 KRT enqueue FDB (3, 00:08:25:fa:3c:82) nh-index > 1328 > >>> Jun 4 13:07:22.953712 krt_dequeue: type FDB op change 3, > >>> 00:08:25:fa:3c:82 Direct nh 1328 > >>> Jun 4 13:07:22.954372 l3nh_fdb_notify: FDB CHANGE vlan <sbc-core> mac > >>> 00:08:25:fa:3c:82 > >>> Jun 4 13:21:18.041160 Attempt to add vlan sbc-core mac > 00:08:25:fa:3c:82, > >>> ifname ge-0/0/5.0, pnac_status 0, 0 > >>> Jun 4 13:21:18.041271 vlan sbc-core mac 00:08:25:fa:3c:82 (tag 40), > iif = > >>> ge-0/0/5.0: present in FDB > >>> Jun 4 13:21:18.041332 (3, 00:08:25:fa:3c:82) next-hop index change > [1328 > >>> -> 1327] > >>> Jun 4 13:21:18.041670 Attempt to add vlan sbc-core mac > 00:08:25:fa:3c:82, > >>> ifname ge-0/0/6.0, pnac_status 0, 0 > >>> Jun 4 13:21:18.041767 vlan sbc-core mac 00:08:25:fa:3c:82 (tag 40), > iif = > >>> ge-0/0/6.0: present in FDB > >>> Jun 4 13:21:18.041807 (3, 00:08:25:fa:3c:82) next-hop index change > [1327 > >>> -> 1328] > >>> Jun 4 13:21:18.041962 KRT enqueue FDB (3, 00:08:25:fa:3c:82) nh-index > 1328 > >>> > >>> It looks to me like the MAC address is jumping around. What do you > think? > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> John > >> _______________________________________________ > >> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
