On Jul 2, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Morgan McLean wrote: > I don't know if they will be giving us lags, which means I'll be potentially > running 10-15 BGP sessions per MX, which is a lot of routes.
I'm not a Juniper person, but the MXes aren't the recommended boxes for your peering/transit edge. > They're running the RE-S-1800 quad core 16GB, but should I opt for partial or > just default at that point? No - you want full tables for analytics purposes, if nothing else, plus one suspects you'll be doing a fair amount of traffic engineering, if your anticipated volume actually comes to fruition. > Its possible all of the links will be from the same provider. Very Bad Idea. Were I you, I'd look at engaging some organization or group of individuals who have experience with this sort of thing to get it all sorted. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <[email protected]> // <http://www.arbornetworks.com> Luck is the residue of opportunity and design. -- John Milton _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
