On 03/07/13 00:56, Darius Jahandarie wrote: > On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Drew Weaver <[email protected]> wrote: >> And what is wrong with the MX80 as a peering/transit router for up to 80Gbps >> of traffic? > > The lack of redundant REs + inability to have an external RE.
Other than the amount of CPU capacity on the MX80 (which has been done to death here) do you really have RE's fail often enough to be a problem? Sure on the larger boxes they're cheap enough that if you're really loading the boxes you might as well have one, but if you add it up I doubt they save that much downtime. The most common failure I've seen on Juniper RE's (by far) is HDD failures, which is largely mitigated on current kit with SSD's.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
