Hello William,

Before 13.2 you would have to use an external loop to terminate the vpls on one 
side and the ppp on the other side (as lt- interface does not support the 
proper encapsulation for ppp).

Starting 13.2 (that was just released), if you use L2VPN rather than VPLS to 
backhaul your DSLAM VLAN, the below feature might do the job w/o consuming 
ports for the external hairpin:

http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.2/topics/concept/pseudowire-subscriber-interfaces-overview.html


Adrien

Le 17 sept. 2013 à 05:39, William Jackson <[email protected]> a écrit 
:

> Gents
> 
> Theoretical question here:
> 
> I currently have a setup where I transport PPPoE frames between my xDSL boxes 
> and a centralised BNG.
> I use one vlan tag per xDSL box aggregator box, so all the subs from a 
> specific box have the same vlan tag.
> 
> xDSL---->(vlan tagged Eth)-->PE-->MPLS Network-->PE-->(vlan tagged 
> Eth)-->BNG(PPPoE) Termination.
> 
> This means that the mpls service I use to send my PPPoE traffic to my 
> centralised BNG ends on the BNGs upstream PE node, and I use a standard 
> vlan-tagging interface between BNG and PE.
> I would like to extend the VPLS service to the BNG ( MX platform ), is it 
> possible to interwork the PPPoE termination into the VPLS service?
> 
> I cant seem to find anything about a type of setup like this?
> 
> Thank you
> 
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to