RG0 only contains Control Plane or REs. In SRX failover, its not necessary to failover RG0 when there is a failover in RG1 due to a link failure. So we only do interface-monitor in RG1, RG2 ... not in RG0. RG0 already run in A/P mode.
It can be possible that SRX B is Primary in RG0 while Secondary in RG1 (means SRX A is Primary in RG 1) Muhammad Fahad Khan JNCIE-M # 756 Lead Network and Security Consultant - IBM +92-301-8247638 Skype: fahad-ibm http://pk.linkedin.com/in/muhammadfahadkhan On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 2:07 PM, R S <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi > > In an SRX5800 cluster > A/P deployment, does anybody recommend to monitor-interface also on RG0 or > not > ? > > PRO ? CONS ? > > > > We did it but > unfortunately during an SPU crash the RG0 didn’t switch properly and JTAC > told us it’s > not recommended monitor-interface under RG0 in same corner case… > > > > Any experience to share > is useful > > > > Tks > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
