And what about syslog or firewall traffic logging flows on the RG1 Active node if RG0 remain active on the Passive ?
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:34:53 +0500 Subject: Re: [j-nsp] SRX monitor-interface question From: [email protected] To: [email protected] CC: [email protected] RG0 only contains Control Plane or REs. In SRX failover, its not necessary to failover RG0 when there is a failover in RG1 due to a link failure. So we only do interface-monitor in RG1, RG2 ... not in RG0. RG0 already run in A/P mode. It can be possible that SRX B is Primary in RG0 while Secondary in RG1 (means SRX A is Primary in RG 1) Muhammad Fahad Khan JNCIE-M # 756 Lead Network and Security Consultant - IBM +92-301-8247638 Skype: fahad-ibm http://pk.linkedin.com/in/muhammadfahadkhan On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 2:07 PM, R S <[email protected]> wrote: Hi In an SRX5800 cluster A/P deployment, does anybody recommend to monitor-interface also on RG0 or not ? PRO ? CONS ? We did it but unfortunately during an SPU crash the RG0 didn’t switch properly and JTAC told us it’s not recommended monitor-interface under RG0 in same corner case… Any experience to share is useful Tks _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
