Re: [j-nsp] Full BGP table, one provider w/ 2 routers, slow forwarding convergence

[Darren O'Connor]

indirect-next-hop doesn't help with two distinct directly connected BGP 
neighbours unfortuantely. It only really helps with iBGP neighbours in which 
the protocol next-hop stays the same but the path to that next-hop changes

Thanks
Darren
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie



> Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:39:45 +0200
> To: chm...@wm.edu
> From: sth...@nethelp.no
> CC: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Full BGP table, one provider w/ 2 routers, slow 
> forwarding convergence
> 
> Do you have
> 
> set routing-options forwarding-table indirect-next-hop
> 
> Relevant for FIB update speed.
> 
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

                                          
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp