I've been hearing for years that quicker convergence is coming 'in a later release'
Thanks Darren http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2014 10:40:29 -0400 > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Full BGP table, one provider w/ 2 routers, slow > forwarding convergence > > I can confirm with inline flow sampling enabled and even with the code to fix > the PR convergence is still slower. I hear there’s a better fix being > released in later code 14.2 if memory serves but I’m not sure. > > On Aug 22, 2014, at 5:13 AM, Euan Galloway > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 03:38:32PM -0400, Clarke Morledge wrote: > > > >> I did upgrade to 13.3R3 to try to resolve PR963060, but I am still seeing > >> enough traffic loss that it makes me skeptical as to whether I have really > >> hit this PR, if the issue has not really been resolved, or if something > >> else is going on. I still think Junos should converge faster. > > > > Did you try disabling inline jflow (and sampling if used), which would > > answer > > the is it/isn't it on that PR (and someone/something to shout at). > > > > -- > > Euan Galloway > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
