indirect-next-hop doesn't help with two distinct directly connected BGP neighbours unfortunately. It only really helps with iBGP neighbours in which the next-hop remains the same but the path changes to that next-hop
Thanks Darren http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie > Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:39:45 +0200 > To: [email protected] > From: [email protected] > CC: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Full BGP table, one provider w/ 2 routers, slow > forwarding convergence > > Do you have > > set routing-options forwarding-table indirect-next-hop > > Relevant for FIB update speed. > > Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
