Thank you, all for sharing your experience. I really appreciate your help. Now I have several things to work on: MS-MPC vs MS-DPC, best service-set approach for our scenario, ... ;-))
Thank you Kind regards Octavio On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:53 AM, Dung.tran <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Octavio! > CGNAT on MX can run two mode : > Option 1) an interface (interface-style service-set) > Option 2) a routing next hop (next-hop service-set) > You can check network topology and choose option 1 or option 2. > Thanks! > > Best regards, > > TRAN QUANG DUNG > Network Engineering > > t (84-4) 39 42 71 00 (ext: 128) > f (84-8) 39 42 71 02 > m (84) 979423570 > > > Ha noi Rep. Office: > R 307, Sky City Tower A, 88 Lang Ha Str., > Dong Da Dist., Ha noi, Vietnam > www.svtech.com.vn > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: juniper-nsp [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf > Of > Octavio Alfageme > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 2:26 PM > To: juniper-nsp > Subject: [j-nsp] CGNAT on a MX240 acting as BNG > > Hi everyone, > > I have several MX240s acting as BNGs for PPPoE subscribers. Due to IPv4 > scarcity I need to start running CGNAT on them (both NAT444 and DS-Lite) > with dedicated MS-DPC cards. I've searching for information about this > scenario and I was unable to find it. Do you know if there are restrictions > to run BNG function and CGNAT for these PPPoE subscribers in the same > MX240? > Does any of you have MX series routers acting as CGNAT/BNGs in your > network? > > Thanks in advance > > Octavio > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
