I agree... it is quite rude and seems to be just a push for cash considering what basic features these are.
...Skeeve *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd [email protected] ; www.eintellegonetworks.com Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> linkedin.com/in/skeeve twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com The Experts Who The Experts Call Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering On 8 November 2014 12:26, Robin Williams <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > We currently make some use of the MPLS CCC functionality of EX3200 and > EX4200 switches with the AFL, but note that their replacements EX3300 and > EX4300 don't have any MPLS support. Does anyone know if this is a > temporary lack of support while the box is being developed further, or is > there no plans no bring this support back in the new products? I don't > like the way the EX3300 is being touted as the replacement for the EX3200 > but the feature set has entirely changed. > > I also think it's a bit rich that you now need an EFL license for things > like OSPF support, where you didn't previously, and for the AFL features > such as BGP, you now need both an EFL *AND* and AFL where you previously > only needed an AFL. > > Would be interested to hear other opinions on this, to me it all seems > like a bit of a silly move on the part of Juniper and a gift to Cisco. > > Regards, > Robin. > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
