Perhaps use a pastebin?
On 4/15/2015 午後 11:24, Jonathan Call wrote:
Here is the output of 'show route extensive'. Hopefully it shows up formatted
properly this time. router1> ...oute 2001:db8:4000::1 extensive
vr-1.inet6.0: 9 destinations, 13 routes (9 active, 0 holddown, 0
hidden)2001:db8:4000::1/128 (3 entries, 1 announced)TSI:Page 0 idx 0 Type 1 val 15b53b0
Nexthop: Self Localpref: 100 AS path: [65471] I Communities:Path 2001:db8:4000::1
Vector len 4. Val: 0 *Direct Preference: 0 Next hop type: Interface
Address: 0x15b877c Next-hop reference count: 2
Next hop: via lo0.1, selected State: <Active Int> Local
AS: 65471 Age: 1w0d 17:26:33 Task: IF
Announcement bits (3): 0-RT 4-BGP_RT_Background 5-Resolve tree 2 AS path: I
AS path: Recorded OSPF3 Preference: 10 Next hop type:
Router Address: 0x15b8944 Next-hop reference count: 1
Next hop: via lo0.1, selected State: <Int>
Inactive reason: Route Preference
Local AS: 65471 Age: 1w0d 17:26:28 Metric: 0
Area: 0.0.0.0 Task: vr-1-OSPF3 AS path: I
AS path: Recorded BGP Preference: 170/-101 Next hop
type: Indirect Address: 0x15b93a8 Next-hop reference
count: 3 Source: 2001:db8:4000::2 Next hop type:
Router, Next hop index: 595 Next hop: fe80:db8:4000:1::3 via
ge-0/0/8.0, selected Protocol next hop: 2001:db8:4000::2
Indirect next hop: 162c000 - State: <Int Ext>
Inactive reason: Route Preference Local AS: 65471 Peer AS: 65471
Age: 21:46:03 Metric: 1 Metric2: 1 Task:
BGP_65471_65471.2001:db8:4000::2+51820 AS path: I
Accepted Localpref: 100 Router ID: 192.168.172.253
Indirect next hops:
1 Protocol next hop: 2001:db8:4000::2 Metric: 1
Indirect next hop: 162c000 - Indirect
path forwarding next hops: 1 Next hop type:
Router Next hop: fe80:db8:4000:1::3 via
ge-0/0/8.0 2001:db8:4000::2/128 Originating RIB:
vr-1.inet6.0 Metric: 1 Node path
count: 1 Forwarding nexthops: 1
Nexthop: fe80:db8:4000:1::3 via ge-0/0/8.0
Jonathan> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] iBGP and IPv6
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
From: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 07:45:00 +0200
On 14/Apr/15 19:37, Jonathan Call wrote:
Why does the router flag the BGP route for the IPv4 loopback as Unusable but
doesn't do the same for the IPv6 loopback address? Does it even matter?
Can you "show extensive" for the route?
Also, try formatting your paste better - I can't quite make it out.
Mark.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
