Okay. I tested this elsewhere and it emailed okay.
router1> ...oute 2001:db8:4000::1 extensive
vr-1.inet6.0: 9 destinations, 13 routes (9 active, 0 holddown, 0 hidden)
2001:db8:4000::1/128 (3 entries, 1 announced)
TSI:
Page 0 idx 0 Type 1 val 15b53b0
Nexthop: Self
Localpref: 100
AS path: [65471] I
Communities:
Path 2001:db8:4000::1 Vector len 4. Val: 0
*Direct Preference: 0
Next hop type: Interface
Address: 0x15b877c
Next-hop reference count: 2
Next hop: via lo0.1, selected
State: <Active Int>
Local AS: 65471
Age: 1w0d 17:26:33
Task: IF
Announcement bits (3): 0-RT 4-BGP_RT_Background 5-Resolve tree 2
AS path: I
AS path: Recorded
OSPF3 Preference: 10
Next hop type: Router
Address: 0x15b8944
Next-hop reference count: 1
Next hop: via lo0.1, selected
State: <Int>
Inactive reason: Route Preference
Local AS: 65471
Age: 1w0d 17:26:28 Metric: 0
Area: 0.0.0.0
Task: vr-1-OSPF3
AS path: I
AS path: Recorded
BGP Preference: 170/-101
Next hop type: Indirect
Address: 0x15b93a8
Next-hop reference count: 3
Source: 2001:db8:4000::2
Next hop type: Router, Next hop index: 595
Next hop: fe80:db8:4000:1::3 via ge-0/0/8.0, selected
Protocol next hop: 2001:db8:4000::2
Indirect next hop: 162c000 -
State: <Int Ext>
Inactive reason: Route Preference
Local AS: 65471 Peer AS: 65471
Age: 21:46:03 Metric: 1 Metric2: 1
Task: BGP_65471_65471.2001:db8:4000::2+51820
AS path: I
Accepted
Localpref: 100
Router ID: 192.168.172.253
Indirect next hops: 1
Protocol next hop: 2001:db8:4000::2 Metric: 1
Indirect next hop: 162c000 -
Indirect path forwarding next hops: 1
Next hop type: Router
Next hop: fe80:db8:4000:1::3 via ge-0/0/8.0
2001:db8:4000::2/128 Originating RIB: vr-1.inet6.0
Metric: 1 Node path count: 1
Forwarding nexthops: 1
Nexthop: fe80:db8:4000:1::3 via ge-0/0/8.0
Jonathan
> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:47:04 +0900
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] iBGP and IPv6
>
> Perhaps use a pastebin?
>
> On 4/15/2015 午後 11:24, Jonathan Call wrote:
> > Here is the output of 'show route extensive'. Hopefully it shows up
> > formatted properly this time. router1> ...oute 2001:db8:4000::1 extensive
> > vr-1.inet6.0: 9 destinations, 13 routes (9 active, 0 holddown, 0
> > hidden)2001:db8:4000::1/128 (3 entries, 1 announced)TSI:Page 0 idx 0 Type 1
> > val 15b53b0 Nexthop: Self Localpref: 100 AS path: [65471] I
> > Communities:Path 2001:db8:4000::1 Vector len 4. Val: 0 *Direct
> > Preference: 0 Next hop type: Interface
> > Address: 0x15b877c Next-hop reference count: 2
> > Next hop: via lo0.1, selected State: <Active Int>
> > Local AS: 65471 Age: 1w0d 17:26:33 Task:
> > IF Announcement bits (3): 0-RT 4-BGP_RT_Background 5-Resolve
> > tree 2 AS path: I AS path: Recorded
> > OSPF3 Preference: 10 Next hop type: Router
> > Address: 0x15b8944 Next-hop reference count: 1
> > Next hop: via lo0.1, selected State: <Int>
> > Inactive reason: Route Preference
> > Local AS: 65471 Age: 1w0d 17:26:28 Metric: 0
> > Area: 0.0.0.0 Task: vr-1-OSPF3 AS
> > path: I AS path: Recorded BGP Preference:
> > 170/-101 Next hop type: Indirect Address:
> > 0x15b93a8 Next-hop reference count: 3 Source:
> > 2001:db8:4000::2 Next hop type: Router, Next hop index: 595
> > Next hop: fe80:db8:4000:1::3 via ge-0/0/8.0, selected
> > Protocol next hop: 2001:db8:4000::2 Indirect next
> > hop: 162c000 - State: <Int Ext> Inactive
> > reason: Route Preference Local AS: 65471 Peer AS: 65471
> > Age: 21:46:03 Metric: 1 Metric2: 1 Task:
> > BGP_65471_65471.2001:db8:4000::2+51820 AS path: I
> > Accepted Localpref: 100 Router ID:
> > 192.168.172.253 Indirect next h
ops:
> > 1 Protocol next hop: 2001:db8:4000::2 Metric: 1
> > Indirect next hop: 162c000 -
> > Indirect path forwarding next hops: 1 Next
> > hop type: Router Next hop:
> > fe80:db8:4000:1::3 via ge-0/0/8.0 2001:db8:4000::2/128
> > Originating RIB: vr-1.inet6.0 Metric: 1
> > Node path count: 1 Forwarding nexthops: 1
> > Nexthop: fe80:db8:4000:1::3 via ge-0/0/8.0
> > Jonathan> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] iBGP and IPv6
> >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> >> From: [email protected]
> >> Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 07:45:00 +0200
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 14/Apr/15 19:37, Jonathan Call wrote:
> >>> Why does the router flag the BGP route for the IPv4 loopback as Unusable
> >>> but doesn't do the same for the IPv6 loopback address? Does it even
> >>> matter?
> >> Can you "show extensive" for the route?
> >>
> >> Also, try formatting your paste better - I can't quite make it out.
> >>
> >> Mark.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
