Hi amarjeet Because if PE1 fails there is faster convergence to PE2 due to neighbor already established.
Cheers James Il 24/apr/2015 13:23, "james list" <[email protected]> ha scritto: > I have a VPLS multi-homed environment with two MX routers (PE1 and PE2) > connected to a single ethernet switch (CE1). I have PE1 configured with > site-preference as "primary" and PE2 as "backup". > > > Behind the CE1 there is a router running OSPF with both MX (on irb > interface). > > > My goal is to have: > > 1) Multihoming to prevent loops > > 2) Let the router run two OSPF neighbor with both PE and not just one > with the primary PE. > > I’m wondering if using: > > > set routing-instances XXXX protocols vpls connectivity-type irb > > > instead of the default (connectivity-type ce) could give me the option to > reach my goal number 2) and if I can introduce any drawback. > > > Or if there is another solution keeping 1). > > > I don’t have a lab to test… > > > Any help/feedback is really appreciated. > > > Greetings > > James > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
