On 7 Jul 2015 12:00 am, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Send juniper-nsp mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of juniper-nsp digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: eBGP Failover (Adam Vitkovsky) > 2. Re: eBGP Failover (Mark Tinka) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 12:11:30 +0000 > From: Adam Vitkovsky <[email protected]> > To: Mark Tinka <[email protected]>, Peter Ehiwe > <[email protected]>, Mohammad Khalil <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] eBGP Failover > Message-ID: > < 627266b72b856946bcd625d4b34b19163165a...@inf-exch-mb-02.gammatelecom.com> > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 > > Hi Mark, > > It comes with unpredictable up to several second failover/restoration times. > It looks like some HW to SW or vice versa signalling failure. > > adam > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Tinka [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: 01 July 2015 13:47 > > To: Adam Vitkovsky; Peter Ehiwe; Mohammad Khalil > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] eBGP Failover > > > > > > > > On 1/Jul/15 10:38, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > > > With LACP you are reliant on the mercy of the service provider. > > > And besides that LACP is tricky so you might not get the failover times you > > are after. > > > > How is LACP tricky? > > > > Mark. > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2015 16:31:13 +0200 > From: Mark Tinka <[email protected]> > To: Adam Vitkovsky <[email protected]>, Peter Ehiwe > <[email protected]>, Mohammad Khalil <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [j-nsp] eBGP Failover > Message-ID: <[email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 > > > > On 6/Jul/15 14:11, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > > > It comes with unpredictable up to several second failover/restoration times. > > It looks like some HW to SW or vice versa signalling failure. > > We have LACP running with an upstream on an ASR9001. No issues. > > I recall running LACP with a peer on an M10i (they had an MX960) at > previous job. No issues. > > We run LACP on about 80% of the routers/switches in our network > (Cisco-Cisco, Cisco-Juniper and Juniper-Juniper). No issues. > > Mark. > > > ------------------------------ > > Subject: Digest Footer > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list > [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > > ------------------------------ > > End of juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 152, Issue 5 > ******************************************* _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
