On 7/7/2015 12:01 AM, Dale Shaw wrote: > Hi David, > > On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:17 AM, David Miller <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > Can anyone tell me the differences between these two optics? > > > > XFP-10G-L-OC192-SR1 740-014279 > > XFP-10G-L-OC192-SR1-C 740-031833 > > 740-014279 = EX-XFP-10GE-LR (EX-series) & SRX-XFP-10GE-LR (SRX-series) > 740-031833 = XFP-10G-L-OC192-SR1 (M/T/MX-series) > > They are similar transceivers but not exactly the same. Perhaps, in > the past, the part-to-SKU mappings were different. > > The latter part seems to support some additional standards (ITU-T > G.693 VSR2000-2R1, 8 Gb/s FC 800-SM-LC-L, 10 Gb/s CPRI, and ITU G.709 > FEC OTU1e/OTU2/OTU2e) but it may not work in platforms it hasn't been > qualified for. > > Cheers, > Dale >
Many thanks for all the replies. All that I have on hand at the moment are 740-031833 optics, so I can't do side by side testing. I have some 740-014279 optics on the way to me and I'll check them out and report back what I find. To add to the fun, I have some optics labeled as the 740-031833 part number with and without the trailing -C https://imgur.com/2MN8KMa My first suspicion was that the two optics were designed for different operating temperature ranges (CO vs DC), but the above part descriptions lead me to believe that these are essentially the same optics differentiated mostly by whether they are "sold for" EX/SRX or M/T/MX. -DMM _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
