On 9/Jul/15 16:59, Adam Vitkovsky wrote: > Right but I guess the main advantage of 9922 and 9912 is that the switch > fabric is modular so one can grow/upgrade until the backplane becomes > obsolete. > But on 9904 the fabric seem to be integrated on the RSP so it's the same as > 9k10 or 9k6 but yes the fabric is faster indeed.
And the ASR99xx will take more of the upcoming line cards that get released. > > Can't find the number now but while searching I did find it's actually 55 to > 60Gbps switch capacity so that makes it directly comparable with ASR920 (the > 1.5RU) -but no redundancy (though the MX104 redundancy is somewhat crippled > by the common switch-fabric -whereas ASR903 has separate RP/SW-fabric) Well, the ASR920 can only hold 20,000 IPv4 entries in FIB. So the MX104, with the ability to do a full table, beats it there. But then again, that is why the ASR920 is better-priced for such a role. Hard to compete with that. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
