Actually we want to build sth. Like this :

————— ISP ——>———— (AE0)      MX80     (Xe-0/0/3)     ——>——        Ex4500

                    (Xe-0/0/1)     (Xe-0/0/2)
                         |              |

                         |              |
                    (Xe-0/0/1)          |
                         |              |
                     SRX 3600 ——— <—— UDP FW
                         |
                   (ae1  4x1Gbit)

                         |
                         |

               Returns MX80 with 4x1G


We have put the policy to inbound side of AE0 because we want to redirect only 
ip addresses that need to be firewalled and the download traffic from the isp 
side.
When we try next-ip instead of routing instance it is hitting to the firewall 
and system working but this time it is dropping so much packets :)
I should not decide where should be the problem








On 23/11/15 12:27, "Dave Bell" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Hi Cahit,
>
>> root@mx80-core# show interfaces ae0
>> aggregated-ether-options {
>>  minimum-links 1;
>>  lacp {
>>  active;
>>  periodic fast;
>>  }
>> }
>> unit 0 {
>>  family inet {
>>  filter {
>>  input FWDirect;
>>  }
>>  address 10.32.35.14/30;
>>  }
>> }
>
>> Request timeout for icmp_seq 14714
>> 36 bytes from 10.32.35.14: Destination Net Unreachable
>> Vr HL TOS  Len   ID Flg  off TTL Pro  cks      Src      Dst
>>  4  5  00 5400 938d   0 0000  38  01 d3ad 192.168.2.102  185.9.159.86
>
>This looks like you are sourcing your traffic from the address on
>interface ae0? If this is the case, then it is not actually ingressing
>ae0, therefore the firewall won't be hit.
>
>Try testing from the thing connected to ae0 (if you can).
>
>Regards,
>Dave
>
>
>On 23 November 2015 at 10:08, Cahit Eyigünlü <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Hello friends  ;
>>
>> We have an MX80 router which has connection on ae0 to our isp
>>
>>
>>
>> root@mx80-core# show interfaces ae0
>> aggregated-ether-options {
>>  minimum-links 1;
>>  lacp {
>>  active;
>>  periodic fast;
>>  }
>> }
>> unit 0 {
>>  family inet {
>>  filter {
>>  input FWDirect;
>>  }
>>  address 10.32.35.14/30;
>>  }
>> }
>>
>>
>> [edit]
>> root@mx80-core# show firewall
>> filter FWDirect {
>>     term UDPFW {
>>         from {
>>             destination-address {
>>                 185.9.159.86/32;
>>             }
>>             protocol udp;
>>         }
>>         then {
>>             log;
>>             routing-instance UDP-Routes;
>>         }
>>     }
>>     term TCPFW {
>>         from {
>>             destination-address {
>>                 185.9.159.86/32;
>>             }
>>         }
>>         then {
>>             count TCPFWTR;
>>             log;
>>             routing-instance TCP-Routes;
>>         }
>>     }
>>     term Default {
>>         then accept;
>>     }
>> }
>>
>> [edit]
>> root@mx80-core# show routing-instances
>> Normal-Routes {
>>     instance-type virtual-router;
>> }
>> TCP-Routes {
>>     instance-type forwarding;
>>     routing-options {
>>         static {
>>             route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 37.123.100.122;
>>         }
>>     }
>> }
>> UDP-Routes {
>>     instance-type forwarding;
>>     routing-options {
>>         static {
>>             route 0.0.0.0/0 next-hop 37.123.100.98;
>>         }
>>     }
>> }
>>
>> [edit]
>> root@mx80-core# show protocols ospf
>> rib-group SPD-Route;
>> area 0.0.0.0 {
>>     interface all;
>>     interface ae0.0 {
>>         disable;
>>     }
>> }
>>
>> [edit]
>>
>> root@mx80-core# show routing-options rib-groups
>> SPD-Route {
>>     import-rib [ inet.0 UDP-Routes.inet.0 TCP-Routes.inet.0 ];
>> }
>>
>> [edit]
>> root@mx80-core#
>>
>>
>>
>> The router has connection to routing instance ip addresses and logging the 
>> connections :
>>
>>
>> root@mx80-core# run ping 37.123.100.122
>> PING 37.123.100.122 (37.123.100.122): 56 data bytes
>> 64 bytes from 37.123.100.122: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=1.194 ms
>> 64 bytes from 37.123.100.122: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.956 ms
>> ^C
>> --- 37.123.100.122 ping statistics ---
>> 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss
>> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.956/1.075/1.194/0.119 ms
>>
>> [edit]
>> root@mx80-core# run ping 37.123.100.98
>> PING 37.123.100.98 (37.123.100.98): 56 data bytes
>> 64 bytes from 37.123.100.98: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.490 ms
>> 64 bytes from 37.123.100.98: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=8.739 ms
>> 64 bytes from 37.123.100.98: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.422 ms
>> ^C
>> --- 37.123.100.98 ping statistics ---
>> 3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss
>> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.422/3.217/8.739/3.905 ms
>>
>> [edit]
>> root@mx80-core# run show firewall log
>> Log :
>> Time      Filter    Action Interface     Protocol        Src Addr            
>>              Dest Addr
>> 08:44:20  pfe       A      ae0.0         ICMP            212.174.232.182     
>>              185.9.159.86
>> 08:44:19  pfe       A      ae0.0         ICMP            212.174.232.182     
>>              185.9.159.86
>> 08:44:18  pfe       A      ae0.0         ICMP            212.174.232.182     
>>              185.9.159.86
>> 08:44:17  pfe       A      ae0.0         ICMP            212.174.232.182     
>>              185.9.159.86
>> 08:44:16  pfe       A      ae0.0         ICMP            212.174.232.182     
>>              185.9.159.86
>> 08:44:15  pfe       A      ae0.0         ICMP            212.174.232.182     
>>              185.9.159.86
>> 08:44:14  pfe       A      ae0.0         ICMP            212.174.232.182     
>>              185.9.159.86
>> 08:44:13  pfe       A      ae0.0         ICMP            212.174.232.182     
>>              185.9.159.86
>> 08:44:12  pfe       A      ae0.0         ICMP            212.174.232.182     
>>              185.9.159.86
>> 08:44:11  pfe       A      ae0.0         ICMP            212.174.232.182     
>>              185.9.159.86
>> 08:44:10  pfe       A      ae0.0         ICMP            212.174.232.182     
>>              185.9.159.86
>> 08:44:09  pfe       A      ae0.0         ICMP            212.174.232.182     
>>              185.9.159.86
>>
>>
>>
>> but we can not access from outside the network :
>>
>>
>>
>> Request timeout for icmp_seq 14714
>> 36 bytes from 10.32.35.14: Destination Net Unreachable
>> Vr HL TOS  Len   ID Flg  off TTL Pro  cks      Src      Dst
>>  4  5  00 5400 938d   0 0000  38  01 d3ad 192.168.2.102  185.9.159.86
>>
>> Request timeout for icmp_seq 14715
>> 36 bytes from 10.32.35.14: Destination Net Unreachable
>> Vr HL TOS  Len   ID Flg  off TTL Pro  cks      Src      Dst
>>  4  5  00 5400 28e7   0 0000  38  01 3e54 192.168.2.102  185.9.159.86
>>
>> Request timeout for icmp_seq 14716
>> 36 bytes from 10.32.35.14: Destination Net Unreachable
>> Vr HL TOS  Len   ID Flg  off TTL Pro  cks      Src      Dst
>>  4  5  00 5400 ffb1   0 0000  38  01 6789 192.168.2.102  185.9.159.86
>>
>> Request timeout for icmp_seq 14717
>> 36 bytes from 10.32.35.14: Destination Net Unreachable
>> Vr HL TOS  Len   ID Flg  off TTL Pro  cks      Src      Dst
>>  4  5  00 5400 99ee   0 0000  38  01 cd4c 192.168.2.102  185.9.159.86
>>
>> Request timeout for icmp_seq 14718
>> 36 bytes from 10.32.35.14: Destination Net Unreachable
>> Vr HL TOS  Len   ID Flg  off TTL Pro  cks      Src      Dst
>>  4  5  00 5400 a9d1   0 0000  38  01 bd69 192.168.2.102  185.9.159.86
>>
>>
>>
>> how can i over come this issue ??
>>
>>
>>
>> [SPDNet Telekomünikasyon  A.S. Logo]<http://https://www.spd.net.tr/>
>>
>> Cahit Eyigünlü
>> SPDNet Telekomünikasyon A.S.
>> +908508409773
>> 75. Yl Mahallesi 5301 Sk No:24/A - MANSA 45100
>> [WebsiteGB]<http://https://www.spd.net.tr/>   [email] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>     [:inkedIn button] 
>> <http://https://www.linkedin.com/company/spdnet>    [Twitter button] 
>> <https://twitter.com/NetSpd>    [Facebook button] 
>> <https://www.facebook.com/SpdNetTR>
>>
>>
>> Bu e-posta kişiye özel olup, gizli bilgiler içeriyor olabilir. Eğer bu 
>> e-posta size yanlışlıkla ulaşmışsa, içeriğini hiç bir şekilde kullanmayınız 
>> ve ekli dosyaları açmayınız. Bu e-posta virüslere karşı anti-virüs 
>> sistemleri tarafından taranmıştır. Ancak SPDNET, bu e-postanın - virüs 
>> koruma sistemleri ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virüs içermediğini 
>> garanti etmez ve meydana gelebilecek zararlardan doğacak hiçbir sorumluluğu 
>> kabul etmez.
>> _______________________________________________
>> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
[SPDNet Telekomünikasyon  A.S. Logo]<http://https://www.spd.net.tr/>

Cahit Eyigünlü
SPDNet Telekomünikasyon A.S.
+908508409773
75. Yl Mahallesi 5301 Sk No:24/A - MANSA 45100
[WebsiteGB]<http://https://www.spd.net.tr/>   [email] 
<mailto:[email protected]>     [:inkedIn button] 
<http://https://www.linkedin.com/company/spdnet>    [Twitter button] 
<https://twitter.com/NetSpd>    [Facebook button] 
<https://www.facebook.com/SpdNetTR>


Bu e-posta kişiye özel olup, gizli bilgiler içeriyor olabilir. Eğer bu e-posta 
size yanlışlıkla ulaşmışsa, içeriğini hiç bir şekilde kullanmayınız ve ekli 
dosyaları açmayınız. Bu e-posta virüslere karşı anti-virüs sistemleri 
tarafından taranmıştır. Ancak SPDNET, bu e-postanın - virüs koruma sistemleri 
ile kontrol ediliyor olsa bile - virüs içermediğini garanti etmez ve meydana 
gelebilecek zararlardan doğacak hiçbir sorumluluğu kabul etmez.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to