Hi, there is no Inter chassis ha for the MX series with MS-cards . Also the number of supported IPSEC tunnel and tunnels per second is really low/bad. the pps is not as bad as the session but is nothing similar to what huawe or alcatel can do.
regards santi Sent from my iPhone > On 27 Dec 2015, at 09:40, Ibariouen Khalid <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > we currenmly have an NS5400 firewalls (two FW in active /passive mode); we > are thinking to replace it with MS-MIC/MPC on existing MX-960. > can you please tell me if we can have redudancy with MX in this case ? > for your information we have NAT and IP-Sec. > i'm asking because in NS5400 we have HA port , and i'm wondering if in case > we use MX how redudancy and session sync will take place ? > can you please advise the fesability of the solution. > it"s urgent > Thanks a lot > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
