http://www.juniper.net/documentation/en_US/junos13.3/topics/usage-guidelines/services-configuring-stateful-firewall-rules.html
For sync between the MS-MICs follow up directly with Juniper (there is a solution but I have not tested it myself yet) On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 8:22 AM, Santiago Martinez < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi, there is no Inter chassis ha for the MX series with MS-cards . Also > the number of supported IPSEC tunnel and tunnels per second is really > low/bad. the pps is not as bad as the session but is nothing similar to > what huawe or alcatel can do. > > regards > > santi > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 27 Dec 2015, at 09:40, Ibariouen Khalid <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi > > we currenmly have an NS5400 firewalls (two FW in active /passive mode); > we > > are thinking to replace it with MS-MIC/MPC on existing MX-960. > > can you please tell me if we can have redudancy with MX in this case ? > > for your information we have NAT and IP-Sec. > > i'm asking because in NS5400 we have HA port , and i'm wondering if in > case > > we use MX how redudancy and session sync will take place ? > > can you please advise the fesability of the solution. > > it"s urgent > > Thanks a lot > > _______________________________________________ > > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
