On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:30:52PM -0500, Jeff Haas wrote: > > > On Jan 28, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Chuck Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Does anyone know why Junos doesn't accept named communities for static > > routes? This doesn't work: > > > > set routing-options static route 192.0.2.0/24 community TEST > > set policy-options community TEST members 65000:100 > > > > Instead we are forced to put the value directly: > > > > set routing-options static route 192.0.2.0/24 community 65000:100 > > set policy-options community TEST members 65000:100 > > > > Can Juniper please fix this? Thanks :-) > > Speaking unofficially, these consistency warts drive us just as crazy as they > do you. > > But in order to preserve our own sanity, and not bring down the wrath of > everyone else's operations who use the existing behavior, it's not likely to > get changed.
Well, please just add a new option "community-name" then, like there is for the operational mode command. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
