+1M Or a policy rule if it makes sense. Like IOS that allows you to apply a route-map to every network statement under the BGP configuration. On Jan 28, 2016 18:56, "Chuck Anderson" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 02:30:52PM -0500, Jeff Haas wrote: > > > > > On Jan 28, 2016, at 2:16 PM, Chuck Anderson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Does anyone know why Junos doesn't accept named communities for static > > > routes? This doesn't work: > > > > > > set routing-options static route 192.0.2.0/24 community TEST > > > set policy-options community TEST members 65000:100 > > > > > > Instead we are forced to put the value directly: > > > > > > set routing-options static route 192.0.2.0/24 community 65000:100 > > > set policy-options community TEST members 65000:100 > > > > > > Can Juniper please fix this? Thanks :-) > > > > Speaking unofficially, these consistency warts drive us just as crazy as > they do you. > > > > But in order to preserve our own sanity, and not bring down the wrath of > everyone else's operations who use the existing behavior, it's not likely > to get changed. > > Well, please just add a new option "community-name" then, like there > is for the operational mode command. > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
