On 25/Mar/16 17:20, Saku Ytti wrote:
> It should be safe for at least 1.5M IPv4 FIB + reasonable IPv6 FIB. > It's pretty far future, unless you have large L3 MPLS VPN tables in > addition. > > There are some other benefits running separate MPC for edge and core, > but it might not make financial sense. Obviously you want core > interfaces in separate MPCs, so having 3 MPC on smallest pop, and > potentially just 1 interface in each core MPC, may be just too high > premium for it. > > I would not specifically plan on separate MPC for edge+core, unless > I'd knew that I'm going to have large VPN tables and 1.5M won't be > enough. We do at least 2x MPC's on each edge router - place core-facing and customer-facing links on both MPC's. If one MPC fails, you maintain connectivity to both north and south network infrastructure, with just a reduce amount of capacity. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
