On 25/Mar/16 18:01, Raphael Mazelier wrote:
> > Multiple loopbacks are always a good idea. > It make maintenance much more painless. > One loopback for inet, one for inet6, one for *vpn. > Also colleague of mine point that is good to separate familly who > support GRES from those who not. I've used multiple Loopbacks for cases where RSVP tunnels need to be strict and avoid the IGP/LDP path. Otherwise, I've found a single Loopback to be just fine, although I can see the case for the different Loopbacks that can be used for different address families. I just feel it's over-engineering. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
