Thanks aaron for the reply.

Vpls don't work on EX4550, the stanza does not even exist.
I'm interested in the result of  your test on acx.
Stanzas exists good starting point.
Do you test further ?

Regards,

Le 03/05/2016 à 22:00, Aaron a écrit :
Raphael , I had issues last year when trying to test VPLS on EX4550...i
don't recall that it worked

In my lab I see the following... seems like the EX4550 is less capable in
its routing-instance types when compared to the ACX5048

**** ACX5048

agould@eng-lab-5048-1> show version
fpc0:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hostname: eng-lab-5048-1
Model: acx5048
Junos: 15.1X54-D20.7
...

agould@eng-lab-5048-1# set routing-instances test instance-type ?

Possible completions:

   evpn                 EVPN routing instance

   forwarding           Forwarding instance

   l2backhaul-vpn       L2Backhaul/L2Wholesale routing instance

   l2vpn                Layer 2 VPN routing instance

   mpls-internet-multicast  Internet Multicast over MPLS routing instance

   no-forwarding        Nonforwarding instance

   virtual-router       Virtual routing instance

   vpls                 VPLS routing instance

   vrf                  Virtual routing forwarding instance


**** EX4550

gvtc@eng-lab-ex4550-1# run show version
fpc0:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hostname: eng-lab-ex4550-1
Model: ex4550-32f
JUNOS Base OS boot [12.2R1.9]
...

gvtc@eng-lab-ex4550-1# set routing-instances test instance-type ?

Possible completions:

   forwarding           Forwarding instance

   l2vpn                Layer 2 VPN routing instance

   mpls-internet-multicast  Internet Multicast over MPLS routing instance

   no-forwarding        Nonforwarding instance

   virtual-router       Virtual routing instance

   vrf                  Virtual routing forwarding instance


-Aaron




_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Reply via email to