Le 05/05/2016 à 15:22, Aaron a écrit :
YW Raphael, I've tested and am still testing a lot of vpls with ACX5048...
what would you like to know ? I'll try to help where I can
BTW, I'm motivated and required to figure out as much as I can on the
ACX5048... my boss just bought 14 of them ! (they have all 14 arrived in my
warehouse downstairs) ...we've already deployed 2 in our live network. One
is solely burning in as a P right now, forwarding nicely about ~2 gbps worth
of subscriber internet traffic just fine. We will be moving over some gear
to it soon so it will soon become a PE for mpls l2vpn's and l3vpn's. ...so
I gotta be comfortable with lots of this stuff before I go live (more live
than it already is :)
Excellent.
Regarding VPLS on ACX....I've tested ...
VPLS - BGP AD w/BGP Sig (I think known as rfc4761)
VPLS - BGP AD w/LDP Sig (I think known as rfc4762) - this is how my
pre-existing cisco gear defaults...so I will need to introduce juniper gear
into my cisco network as vpls bg ad w/ldp sig
And all is working as expected ?
I'm specially interesting in :
- l3vpn ldp/rvsp signaled (and is auto-export is working ?), and also is
Mpls (ldp/rvsp signaled not the problem) work on tagged link ?
- l2circuit (ldp based), l2vpn (bgp/rvsp based)
Subsidiary question 1 : do you know if they are a maximum label stack
depth on acx?
Subsidiary question 2 : have you test if the snmp counter on vlan, or
sub interface work as expected ?
They are know limitations I know on Ex4550.
These tests were done with pretty much all of the following signaling
lsp/pw's to one another ...
Cisco ASR9K
Cisco ASR920 (2 flavors as I recall)
Cisco ASR903
Cisco ME3600
Juniper MX104
Juniper ACX5048
Good luck ;)
- I try to keep good notes on my findings during testing so please let me
know what you need and I'll try to dig it up, or recall it from memory
Thks.
--
Raphael Mazelier
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
