On 25/May/16 18:44, Michael Still wrote:
> Couple reasons. First is that this is pretty shiny new product and it's a > good idea to expect bugs to be found in it. Second is that it requires you > to run much newer / less well baked code than a lot of people are > comfortable with in their networks. Combine these two and there's going to > be lots of hesitation on these for 6 months or so. The 1800 has been a real > workhorse on this platform for a few years now and has proven to be a > pretty good RE and still good for the majority of the uses cases out there. +1. There are already a bunch of differences in Junos 15, before you add this 64GB RE with its own intricacies. I'll tread slowly. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp