On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 08:45:17PM +0100, Charlie Allom wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Jared Mauch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> You want to set indirect-next-hop in all use-cases. This allows
> > faster FIB convergence upon RIB events because all shared next-hops can be
> > updated
> > at once.
> >
> Is this the case for chassis MX104 and 80? Is your recommendation to run
> with indirect-next-hop on them as well?
>
> ..or are there downsides on these smaller units?
Yes, I would use this on all JunOS devices myself.
- Jared
--
Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from [email protected]
clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only mine.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected]
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
