I don't upgrade software unless I have a good reason to...especially if my network is fairly stable and I know what I have.
Aaron > On Jul 4, 2018, at 9:31 AM, Colton Conor <colton.co...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Gustavo, > > We you say " Another problem was upgrading to the lastest Junos JTAC > recommended that made the ACX5048 unusable... ( Junos was unable to find the > physical ports..) We had to downgrade to get it back working again.." what > version was this as JTAC recently changed their recommended version? It seem > everyone on this thread is talking about software train 15.1X54. > > However, the current JTAC recommended version is Junos 17.3R2 as of 14 May > 2018. Why is everyone running 15.1X54 code? > > Has anyone upgraded to Junos 17.3R2 on the ACX's? No matter the model, all > ACX's current recommended is now Junos 17.3R2 > > >> On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Gustavo Santos <gustkil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I had some issues with ACX5048 , the most noticable was arp packets from >> pure L2 vlans and VPLS punting to CPU and flooding the default arp policer >> police.. >> JTAC was able to reproduce the issue and gave us an option to disable >> default arp policer until they release a service release to fix this issue >> that was solved indeed. >> >> Another problem was upgrading to the lastest Junos JTAC recommended that >> made the ACX5048 unusable... ( Junos was unable to find the physical >> ports..) We had to downgrade to get it back working again.. >> >>> On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 8:05 PM Alexandre Guimaraes >>> <alexandre.guimar...@ascenty.com> wrote: >>> Better in terms of concept. In term of usage, i still investing in qfx5100 >>> >>> Acx5058 Suppose to be a promise of a new future, unfortunately, with all >>> problematic of the qfx5100 hardware, the acx5048 leak vlan till the last >>> breath of cpu.... after that, all deamons and services going down.... up >>> and down, up and down. >>> >>> I never more brought one peace ACX5048 after jtac didnt responds why and >>> solution for the leaking...( I have only two acx5048 and hundreds on >>> QFX...). >>> >>> The new promise is the new acx5448. No vlan leaking, a good load >>> balance(ae) algorithm, full of this.... full of that.... a lot of promise. >>> >>> Let’s see... >>> >>> att >>> Alexandre >>> >>> Em 1 de jul de 2018, à(s) 19:31, Colton Conor <colton.co...@gmail.com> >>> escreveu: >>> >>> > What is the main difference between these two boxes? Hardware wise they >>> > look identical. Is there anything on the hardware side that makes the >>> > ACX5048 better than a QFX5100, or is it only software related? >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >>> _______________________________________________ >>> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
