Yes... Exactly. I upgraded to 17.3R2 and was a total mess. And had to downgrade to 15.1X train.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:31 AM Colton Conor <[email protected]> wrote: > Gustavo, > > We you say " Another problem was upgrading to the lastest Junos JTAC > recommended that made the ACX5048 unusable... ( Junos was unable to find > the physical ports..) We had to downgrade to get it back working again.." > what version was this as JTAC recently changed their recommended version? > It seem everyone on this thread is talking about software train 15.1X54. > > However, the current JTAC recommended version is Junos 17.3R2 as of 14 May > 2018. Why is everyone running 15.1X54 code? > > Has anyone upgraded to Junos 17.3R2 on the ACX's? No matter the model, > all ACX's current recommended is now Junos 17.3R2 > > > On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 8:11 AM, Gustavo Santos <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I had some issues with ACX5048 , the most noticable was arp packets from >> pure L2 vlans and VPLS punting to CPU and flooding the default arp policer >> police.. >> JTAC was able to reproduce the issue and gave us an option to disable >> default arp policer until they release a service release to fix this issue >> that was solved indeed. >> >> Another problem was upgrading to the lastest Junos JTAC recommended that >> made the ACX5048 unusable... ( Junos was unable to find the physical >> ports..) We had to downgrade to get it back working again.. >> >> On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 8:05 PM Alexandre Guimaraes < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Better in terms of concept. In term of usage, i still investing in >>> qfx5100 >>> >>> Acx5058 Suppose to be a promise of a new future, unfortunately, with all >>> problematic of the qfx5100 hardware, the acx5048 leak vlan till the last >>> breath of cpu.... after that, all deamons and services going down.... up >>> and down, up and down. >>> >>> I never more brought one peace ACX5048 after jtac didnt responds why and >>> solution for the leaking...( I have only two acx5048 and hundreds on >>> QFX...). >>> >>> The new promise is the new acx5448. No vlan leaking, a good load >>> balance(ae) algorithm, full of this.... full of that.... a lot of promise. >>> >>> Let’s see... >>> >>> att >>> Alexandre >>> >>> Em 1 de jul de 2018, à(s) 19:31, Colton Conor <[email protected]> >>> escreveu: >>> >>> > What is the main difference between these two boxes? Hardware wise they >>> > look identical. Is there anything on the hardware side that makes the >>> > ACX5048 better than a QFX5100, or is it only software related? >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >>> _______________________________________________ >>> juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp >>> >> > _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
