> Of Mark Tinka > Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2018 9:47 PM > > > > On 2/Oct/18 21:13, James Bensley wrote: > > > I presume that if one were to run MT-ISIS there would be no impact to > IPv4? > > We already run MT for IS-IS. I consider this as basic a requirement as "Wide > Metrics". > > However, the issue here is BFD sees the whole of IS-IS as a client. So if BFD > has a moment, it will signal its client (IS-IS), regardless of whether the > moment was for IPv4 or IPv6. > If you'd have separate ISIS process for v6 would it be possible to spin up a separate/dedicated BFD process for that ISIS? Although I'm afraid it's going to be just a single BFD process on a particular link for all protocols running adjacencies on that link...
adam netconsultings.com ::carrier-class solutions for the telecommunications industry:: _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
