On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 10:13, Mark Tinka <[email protected]> wrote: > On 3/Oct/18 11:09, [email protected] wrote: > > If you'd have separate ISIS process for v6 would it be possible to spin up a > separate/dedicated BFD process for that ISIS?
Unless I'm mistaken BFD isn't "multi-tenant", so only one set of BFD packet exchanges can exist per-interface, there is no support for multiple BFD session on the same interface (by which I mean layer 2 broadcast domain in the case of sub-interfaces). This kind of makes sense as BFD is supposed to test for unidirectional communication failure of the physical link (the fact that it runs in both directions gives bidirectional failure detection). So we can run BFDv4 and/or BFDv6 on an interface but only one instance per-interface otherwise you'd need to negotiate different port numbers for the different instances on the same interface? Cheers, James. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
