On 19/Jul/19 16:48, [email protected] wrote: > Agree with the 40g dead in the future statement above but the 100 instead of > 40 cause it's cheaper argument I'm not actually getting. Unless your customer says they only have 40Gbps ports, don't want N x 10Gbps, won't be buying 100Gbps ports anytime soon, and need the service NOW! Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
- [j-nsp] 40Gig Ether for MX480 John Brown
- Re: [j-nsp] 40Gig Ether for MX480 Jared Mauch
- Re: [j-nsp] 40Gig Ether for MX480 Nathan Ward
- Re: [j-nsp] 40Gig Ether for MX480 Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] 40Gig Ether for MX480 adamv0025
- Re: [j-nsp] 40Gig Ether for MX480 Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] 40Gig Ether for MX480 Colton Conor
- Re: [j-nsp] 40Gig Ether for MX480 Aaron Gould
- Re: [j-nsp] 40Gig Ether for MX480 Luis Balbinot
- Re: [j-nsp] 40Gig Ether for MX480 Jonathan Lewis
