Hi, On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 07:33:59PM +0000, Eric Van Tol wrote: > Hi all, > I need to bring up a 2x10G LAG between an MX204 and a customer's ASR 1002-X > and I want to make sure the links get load balanced as closely and reliably > as possible. Junos docs say, "The hash-computation for the forward and > reverse flow must be identical." They go on to detail how to configure a link > index to each physical port and that Trio chipsets require symmetrical > load-balancing.
That sounds a bit weird... why should the device care how the other
end balances its packets? Never heard anyone state this, and I can't
come up with a reason why.
gert
--
"If was one thing all people took for granted, was conviction that if you
feed honest figures into a computer, honest figures come out. Never doubted
it myself till I met a computer with a sense of humor."
Robert A. Heinlein, The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany [email protected]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
