On 19/Jul/19 22:33, Olivier Benghozi wrote: > Yes, you'd better drop all the hash+loadbalance+linkindex conf (by the way, > on MX the "hash-key" knob is only for DPC cards, 10+ years old). > > However about the LAG itself, if you want something reliable you really > should use LACP instead of static LAG. > Static LAGs, a good way to get your traffic lost... We now restrict LAG's to router-switch 802.1Q trunks. On backbone links, we've found regular IP ECMP to be more reliable than LAG's. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
- [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR 1002-X and Juniper MX204 Eric Van Tol
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR 1002-X and Junip... Gert Doering
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR 1002-X and J... Eric Van Tol
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR 1002-X a... Gert Doering
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR 1002... Olivier Benghozi
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between... Per Westerlund
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG bet... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG bet... Nathan Ward
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG bet... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG bet... Nathan Ward
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG bet... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between... Olivier Benghozi
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG bet... Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ad LAG between ASR 1002-X and J... Mark Tinka
