Normally in layer 2 like Voldemort and evpn you need a separate layer-2-Control instance to activate layer 2 control protocols like SPT IMHO the mentioned behavior is a bug
Regards Alexander Von meinem iPhone gesendet > Am 18.10.2019 um 11:09 schrieb Rob Foehl <[email protected]>: > > On Fri, 18 Oct 2019, Gert Doering wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 05:37:16PM -0400, Rob Foehl wrote: >>> Is EVPN expected to be forwarding BPDUs at all, intact or otherwise? >> >> The way understand "how things are meant to be plugged together", you >> should not see forwarded BPDUs - "containing layer2 madness to one >> attachment site" is the whole point, isn't it? >> >> I could see very special cases where it would be necessary, but that >> would need to be a non-default-enabled switch. > > Right, I'd only expect this to work in very specific "make it entirely > transparent" cases... It looks like both Cisco and Huawei document options > related to BPDU tunneling, and neither enable any of it by default. Not > coming up with much else for comparison. > > Juniper is now telling me that this is occuring by design, but can't point to > any documentation or standards which support that, nor explain why it > suddenly changed post-upgrade. I'm... not convinced. > > -Rob > > > _______________________________________________ > juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
