Vpls not Voldemort Von meinem iPhone gesendet
> Am 18.10.2019 um 11:20 schrieb Alexander Marhold <alexander.marh...@gmx.at>: > > Normally in layer 2 like Voldemort and evpn you need a separate > layer-2-Control instance to activate layer 2 control protocols like SPT > IMHO the mentioned behavior is a bug > > Regards Alexander > > Von meinem iPhone gesendet > >> Am 18.10.2019 um 11:09 schrieb Rob Foehl <r...@loonybin.net>: >> >> On Fri, 18 Oct 2019, Gert Doering wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 05:37:16PM -0400, Rob Foehl wrote: >>>>> Is EVPN expected to be forwarding BPDUs at all, intact or otherwise? >>> >>> The way understand "how things are meant to be plugged together", you >>> should not see forwarded BPDUs - "containing layer2 madness to one >>> attachment site" is the whole point, isn't it? >>> >>> I could see very special cases where it would be necessary, but that >>> would need to be a non-default-enabled switch. >> >> Right, I'd only expect this to work in very specific "make it entirely >> transparent" cases... It looks like both Cisco and Huawei document options >> related to BPDU tunneling, and neither enable any of it by default. Not >> coming up with much else for comparison. >> >> Juniper is now telling me that this is occuring by design, but can't point >> to any documentation or standards which support that, nor explain why it >> suddenly changed post-upgrade. I'm... not convinced. >> >> -Rob >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
