On 12/Nov/19 12:02, Saku Ytti wrote: > Do you run BFD keepalives from LC CPU or NPU? I don't know if MX204 > has real linecard CPU, or if it is like PTX1k where due to cost saving > there is no separate linecard CPU. If that is the case, and you don't > want NPU/inline BFD disabling distributed BFD is actually CPU cheaper > than doing LC CPU and less risky. On our MX480's, we've known for a very long time that IPv4 BFD is supported in the PFE. However, IPv6 BFD runs on the RE. Last year, we got an ER submitted with Juniper to fix this as we believe IPv4 and IPv6 parity is crucial to IPv6's success. I sent a a reminder a month ago, haven't heard back. Let me ping my SE. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Rolf Hanßen
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? adamv0025
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Gavin Henry
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Bill Blackford
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Rob Foehl
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Rob Foehl
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Nitzan Tzelniker
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? adamv0025
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Mark Tinka
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? adamv0025
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Saku Ytti
- Re: [j-nsp] MX204 vs. MX240?? Karl Gerhard