I run martini rfc 4447 ldp-based l2circuits as well as vpls on our mx204’s and also acx5048’s (I think junos 15.x and 17.x on 5048 and I think it’s 18.x on 204)… I don’t think I’ve tried mpls on qfx5120 (not sure what version of gfx5100) you use.
I just tried to lab up l2circuit on one of my qrx5120’s and I get a license error for mpls feature -Aaron From: Colton Conor <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 16, 2021 2:30 PM To: Aaron <[email protected]> Cc: Juniper List <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] ACX Questions I just received an off list email stating that the ACX5048 does support l2circuit (LDP signaled). Is this the same feature as Ethernet-over-MPLS (L2 circuit)? If so why is it showing this feature is not supported on ACX (or MX for that matter)? Is the feature explorer incorrect? https://apps.juniper.net/feature-explorer/feature-info.html?fKey=6620 <https://apps.juniper.net/feature-explorer/feature-info.html?fKey=6620&fn=Ethernet-over-MPLS%20(L2%20circuit)> &fn=Ethernet-over-MPLS%20(L2%20circuit) I do see 20.3R1 Starting in Junos OS Release 20.3R1, support for Layer 2 circuit to provide Layer 2 VPN and VPWS with LDP signaling. On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 8:52 AM Colton Conor <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Thanks all for this information. Aaron I had my client run this same command on their QFX5100, and it too has max 3 labels. It seems the issue is that the client needs a layer 2 transport over a layer 3 network. VPLS is the logical choice, and the ACX5048 supports this according to the Juniper Feature Explorer. The QFX5100, however, does not. What layer 2 over Layer 3 option do you recommend for the QFX5100 to talk to an ACX5048 or MX204 on the other end? It looks like the QFX5100 supports Ethernet-over-MPLS (L2 circuit). Is this an alternative to VPLS? ACX and MX does not support Ethernet-over-MPLS (L2 circuit) however. It seems there is no common protocol that both the QFX and ACX/MX share in common under the Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) section of the feature explorer. Is there any solution other than replacing the QFX with ACX's or MX's? https://apps.juniper.net/feature-explorer/select-platform.html?category=Switching <https://apps.juniper.net/feature-explorer/select-platform.html?category=Switching&typ=1#family=&pid=31705100&platform=QFX5100&rel=20.4R1&sid=1093&stat=0.10700692867685069&swName=Junos%20OS> &typ=1#family=&pid=31705100&platform=QFX5100&rel=20.4R1&sid=1093&stat=0.10700692867685069&swName=Junos%20OS On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 12:51 AM <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > wrote: Of the interfaces configured for mpls on this acx, they show max labels 3 me@5048> show mpls interface detail | grep "Interface|labels" Interface: ae0.0 Maximum labels: 3 Interface: ae40.0 Maximum labels: 3 Interface: xe-0/0/0.0 Maximum labels: 3 Interface: ge-0/0/3.0 Maximum labels: 3 Interface: ge-0/0/5.0 Maximum labels: 3 Interface: ge-0/0/13.0 Maximum labels: 3 Interface: ge-0/0/18.0 Maximum labels: 3 Interface: ge-0/0/24.0 Maximum labels: 3 Interface: ge-0/0/38.0 Maximum labels: 3 me@5048> show system information Model: acx5048 Family: junos Junos: 17.4R2-S11 Hostname: 5048 -Aaron _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
