Thank you very much, Jeff, for sharing your experience. Will watch
closely Release Notes for upcoming Junos releases. And kudos to Juniper
for finding and fixing it, 1,5 week is very fast reaction!.
Kind regards,
Andrey
Litterick, Jeff (BIT) писал(а) 2023-06-09 12:41:
This is why we got the MX304. It was a test to replace our MX10008
Chassis, which we bought a few of because we had to get at a
reasonable price into 100G at high density at multiple sites a few
years back now. Though we really only need 4 line cards, with 2 being
for redundancy. The MX1004 was not available at the time back then
(Wish it had been. The MX10008 is a heavy beast indeed and we had to
use fork lifts to move them around into the data centers). But
after handling the MX304 we will most likely for 400G go to the
MX10004 line for the future and just use the MX304 at very small edge
sites if needed. Mainly due to full FPC redundancy requirements at
many of our locations. And yes we had multiple full FPC failures in
the past on the MX10008 line. We went through at first an RMA cycle
with multiple line cards which in the end was due to just 1 line cards
causing full FPC failure on a different line card in the chassis
around every 3 months or so. Only having everything redundant across
both FPCs allowed us not to have serious downtime.
_______________________________________________
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
