One of the reason can be follow, Juniper for 1G interface has name ge-x/x/x and the name of 10G interface is xe-y/y/y. So, you need use different interface name for 1G and 10G interfaces in your configuration.
11 листопада 2024, 13:40:30, Від "Bernhard Schmidt via juniper-nsp" <[email protected]>: Am 11.11.24 um 00:39 schrieb Crist Clark: > https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/cli-reference/topics/ref/statement/auto-negotiation-edit-interfaces.html > > <https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/software/junos/cli-reference/topics/ref/statement/auto-negotiation-edit-interfaces.html> > > NOTE: 1G optical transceivers do not support auto-negotiation on EX4100 > 1G/10G uplink module (PIC 1/PIC 2) and EX4400 1G/10G interface. 1G-T > supports auto-negotiation on these ports. Shit, I figured as much. In the lab I have just successfully tested Arista SFP-10G-RA-1G-LX (rate adapting transceivers, 10G on the electrical side and 1G on the optical side) and the link came up just fine. So that's an option for small-scale, but these transceivers are quite expensive. Haven't found them 3rd party yet. Bernhard _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
