F# was a research project. I doubt there would be enough research-fu in just doing it again for the JVM, which is after all very similar.
On 11/1/07, Matt Hellige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Nov 1, 10:01 pm, Jon Harrop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Could a CAML derivative language for the JVM gain the same traction that F# > > is > > gaining on .NET? > > Perhaps if someone invested the same amount of money in it... (I guess > that's a bit cynical, but only a bit.) > > Matt > > > > > -- GMail doesn't have rotating .sigs, but you can see mine at http://www.ccil.org/~cowan/signatures --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to jvm-languages@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
