-1 on labels. They just clutter the space available for displaying the real subject of the message. Any decent mail client will allow you to sort messages into subfolders, color code them, etc. based on the value of the To or List-ID header.
Attila. On 2007.12.01., at 10:52, Alex Blewitt wrote: > > All my messages to [email protected] are automatically > filtered based on a 'to:[email protected]', which then > applies a label and archives it. Having a subject doesn't give you > anything extra that you can't get from automatic filters applying > labels. > > Alex. > > On Dec 1, 2007 3:12 AM, David Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> +1 GMail is easier to deal with if stuff is in the title >> >> >> On 11/30/07, Alex Lam S.L. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> Just my 2 cents: I use "[email protected] " as the >>> filter >>> criterion, and so far it's been working like a charm. >>> >>> Alex. >>> >>> On Nov 30, 2007 11:35 PM, Fernando Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Could someone ( managers ) add the [jvm-languages] as prefix for >>>> every >>>> message, I think it's better for organization/classification. >>>> as well we can quickly spot some interesting message between all >>>> those >>>> unnecessary emails :) >>>> >>>> regards >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Fernando Meyer http://fmeyer.org >>>> JBoss Rules Core Developer >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
