Daniel Green wrote: > For some users in certain environments/clients it is clear that a > prefix would provide clarity. Don't make the assumption that everyone > is able to use the gmail web interface. So if some will be helped, as > many responders to this post have claimed, the question becomes, would > titles prefixed by [jvm] degrade quality for users who do not want it?
I think a short prefix is acceptable, and the only arguments against it are for space/clutter reasons. For folks that don't filter mail, I know it can be irritating to not have something in the title to visually distinguish. So I'll add a prefix of [jvm-l] to mail ([jvm] seemed a bit too general). - Charlie --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
