> I'm not going to try to describe the JRuby way, because it's not nearly
> as good as we'd like it.

I'd be curious just the same, to learn about what you like and dislike
about your approach.

I *just* started doing this work for Hecl (j2me doesn't have
reflection, so it just didn't make sense), so I need to come up to
speed quickly.  I wrote about my recent efforts here:

http://journal.dedasys.com/articles/2007/12/05/hecl-java-integration

Given that Hecl isn't very complicated in terms of types, for now I
used the "simplest thing that could possibly work", and match on the
name first, and then on the compatibility between argument types in
Hecl and Java.  It's not particularly beautiful, but it works for the
moment.

-- 
David N. Welton

http://www.welton.it/davidw/

http://www.dedasys.com/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM 
Languages" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to