Attila Szegedi wrote: > A memory leak? > > marshalTypes certainly isn't. It might retain Class objects used in > argument types of the overloaded method, but those can't be unloaded > anyway until the class that the method itself belongs could be unloaded.
Which presumably leads to the marshalTypes going away as well, in a perfect world...yes? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
