Jon,  Can you specify how you are running these benchmarks?  I did not
see version of arguments to JVM (or .Net runtime).  You are using
-server I assume...

-Tom

On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Jon Harrop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>  On Wednesday 23 April 2008 09:19:47 hlovatt wrote:
>  > I found a bit more time in the day and worked out how to run the C#
>  > compiler from the command line. I used the following command:
>  >
>  > csc /optimize /out:commandline.exe *.cs
>  >
>  > Then when I run commandline I get:
>  >
>  > SciGMark 1.0 - C# - specialized
>  >
>  > FFT (1024): 388.779673030229
>  > SOR (100x100):   630.880482605193
>  > Monte Carlo : 76.1505509057327
>  > Sparse matmult (N=1000, nz=5000): 576.581135920473
>  > LU (100x100): 508.721326139402
>  > PolyMult (N=40): 327.208768923184
>  > Composite Score: 418.053656254036
>  >
>  > Platform Information
>  > CLR Version: 2.0.50727.1433
>  > Working Set: 5840896
>  >
>  > Which is a considerable improvement over before, but still 1.5 times
>  > slower than Java. However on a personal note; I don't usually bother
>  > optimising further when I get within a factor of 2, so I would say
>  > that C# is fast enough.
>
>  On my machine, this benchmark is only 17% faster in Java for the small
>  problems and 0.04% faster for the large problems. That is well within the
>  variation between individual tests, the largest of which is the CLR being
>  2.44x faster on the polynomial multiplication test.
>
>  --
>
>
> Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
>  http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e
>
>
>  >
>



-- 
Blog: http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ThomasEEnebo
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] , [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM 
Languages" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to