Your results seem to be the outliers - are you certain you are using
the Scimarks referenced in the paper?

When I compile the C# benchmarks with:

c:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.5\csc /optimize+ /debug- /
checked- *.cs

And run the large set with:

commandline -large

I get:

SciGMark 1.0 - C# - specialized

FFT (1048576): 68.24358711148
SOR (1000x1000):   336.610476965462
Monte Carlo : 103.895055082435
Sparse matmult (N=100000, nz=1000000): 363.889491977595
LU (1000x1000): 472.132470273794
PolyMult (N=40): 282.144700451176
Composite Score: 271.152630310324

Platform Information
CLR Version: 2.0.50727.1433
Working Set: 21704704

When I compile the Java code with no compiler options and use the
server VM I get:

SciGMark 1.0 - Java - specialized
FFT (1048576): 66.14391779366471
SOR (1000x1000):   862.4075989952408
Monte Carlo : 210.20788286956355
Sparse matmult (N=100000, nz=1000000): 308.99216463285444
LU (1000x1000): 512.0327520949826
PolyMult (N=100): 432.48570135288116

Composite Score: 398.7116696231979

java.vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
java.version: 1.6.0_06
os.arch: x86
os.name: Windows XP
os.version: 5.1

Which makes Java about 1.6 times quicker (essentially the same as the
small set results).

Your results don't seem to tie up with other peoples - are you certain
you are running the right benchmarks? The claim that Java is faster
than C# seems quite reasonable given this set of results - why are
yours different than other peoples?

On Apr 24, 4:34 am, Jon Harrop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 23 April 2008 19:11:08 Thomas E Enebo wrote:
>
> > Jon,  Can you specify how you are running these benchmarks?
>
> For C++ and Java, I downloaded the source, compiled it with "make" and ran it.
> For C#, I copied the source into a VS project, set it to "Release" mode,
> built and ran it.
>
> > I did not see version of arguments to JVM (or .Net runtime).
>
> Neither did I. :-)
>
> > You are using -server I assume...
>
> Yes. That is the default here.
>
> --
> Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy 
> Ltd.http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM 
Languages" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to