Patrick Wright wrote:
> Per
>
> Glad to hear you are heading towards a new release!
>
> Out of interest--have you looked at SISC Scheme (http://sisc-scheme.org/)?
Not closely. SISC Scheme does have some advantages - most notably it
supports full continuations and in general better compatibility with
R5RS. As I understand it, it doesn't compile down to bytecodes, though
it supposedly does get decent performance.
I believe Kawa offers better performance, and better integration with
Java - if nothing else because Kawa compiles to standard class files,
so you can ship .jars, applets, servlets, etc in the same way
you ship Java .jars, applets, servlets, etc.
A real (more fair and more informative) comparison would be useful
but would take more work ...
--
--Per Bothner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://per.bothner.com/
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM
Languages" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
