Hi Per > I believe Kawa offers better performance, and better integration with > Java - if nothing else because Kawa compiles to standard class files, > so you can ship .jars, applets, servlets, etc in the same way > you ship Java .jars, applets, servlets, etc.
I'd like to hear (on this list) sometime how you approach interpretation vs. compilation in Kawa. No hurry (I imagine you're pretty busy ATM with J1 preparations and JFX), but would be interesting to see how you approached it, esp. since many languages we're hearing about on this list support an interpreted mode, or a compiled mode, and others support both. In that regard, understanding how you used your bytecode generation libraries in the interpreter and compiler would be interesting as well. Cheers Patrick --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JVM Languages" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/jvm-languages?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
